Down is Up, and Up is Down…
February 15, 2010
At least for some folks…
America is in the midst of genocide, and a significant portion of the victims of genocide are African-American kids. Of 
course, I’m talking about the holocaust of abortion. And one outfit has begun to advertise in the Atlanta area about the fact that
Black Children are an Endangered Species
The connected website is TooManyAborted, and it tells the stories of how little black kids are being murdered in the womb, as well as the story of the Negro Project, a plot initiated by the white supremacist Margaret Sanger, who began Planned Parenthood. The truth is devastating, of course…which is why liberal feminist loons will be up in arms.
Check that: one already is. Here’s the quote by Spelman College professor Beverly Guy-Sheftall:
“To use racist arguments to try to bait black people to get them to be anti-abortion is just disgusting.”
OK…let me get this straight, Ms. Guy-Sheftall: it’s not racist to abort millions of little black kids in an effort, begun by Ms. Sanger, to racially-cleanse American society, but it is racist to call attention to that fact. She went on:
“Many black people don’t know who Margaret Sanger is and could care less.”
OK…so instead of educating people as to who she was and her agenda, you’d rather leave members of your own race in the dark about the vile agenda she promoted. Oh, and you are an educator?
Down is up, and up is down, apparently for the Ms. Guy-Sheftalls of the world…
Tebow and the Feminazis
February 3, 2010
So you’ve heard by now of the “controversy” manufactured by a few out-of-touch, off-the-deep-end-left “women’s groups” about the Super Bowl ad (which they have not even seen) featuring Tim Tebow’s mom explaining the choice she made not to abort young Tim, though doctors advised her to. Wait…the choice she made…doesn’t “pro-choice” mean that women ought to have a choice about whether or not to abort children? And didn’t Mrs. Tebow make a choice? Or was it the wrong choice?
Really, it’s sad/preposterous/childish for these silly women to raise this objection. Oh, wait, the ad is sponsored by Evil Incarnate (aka Focus on the Family), and thus the pathetic vitriol; here’s an excerpt from the (typical leftist, brainless, mud-slinging) letter written by the far-lefties to CBS News to protest the ad:
“By offering one of the most coveted advertising spots of the year to an anti-equality, anti-choice, homophobic organization, CBS is aligning itself with a political stance that will damage its reputation, alienate viewers, and discourage consumers from supporting its shows and advertisers.”
Methinks somebody needs to grow up. Sally Jenkins is an example of one pro-choice lady who is grown-up, and isn’t afraid to buck the Feminazi Fundamentalists on this one; she writes a column entitled Tebow’s Super Bowl ad isn’t intolerant; its critics are.
My sentiments exactly.
Two Choices in the Life Debate
January 29, 2010
Scott Roeder, heinous murderer, was rightly convicted of Murder One today. I’d have voted for conviction, without giving it a second thought.
And it’s interesting: there are two positions when it comes to the sanctity of life. One position holds that it is not acceptable for one person to take the life of another person without the consent of the other person. This is the pro-life position, and I am pro-life. The other position holds that one person ought to have the right to unilaterally choose to end the life of another person without the other person’s consent. This is the “pro-choice” position. People who believe that they ought to have the prerogative to chooose to end the life of an unborn child are labeled pro-choice. Scott Roeder believes that he had the prerogative to choose to end the life of George Tiller.
Ergo, Scott Roeder and abortion supporters are in the same camp. Period.
I’m NOT Anti-Abortion; I’m Pro-Life
January 22, 2010
And there is a difference.
It would seem that there’s no better day that this to make that distinction, for today, two disparate events are taking place. One is the annual March for Life in D.C., this on the 37th anniversary of the unconstitutional Roe v. Wade decision, an exercise of raw judicial overreach that accelerated, rather than settled, the angst attending the question of abortion in this country. The other event is the beginning of the trial of a cold-blooded murderer named Scott Roeder, a monster who murdered a monster, Dr. George Tiller, aka “Tiller the Killer”, one of the nation’s most abominable abortion doctors, who regularly and with apparently no conscience snuffed out late-term pregnancies.
Scott Roeder is anti-abortion. He is not pro-life. I am pro-life, not anti-abortion.
What am I saying, and why does this matter? What I am saying is that Scott Roeder is not on my team. Period. Nor is anybody who would advocate or justify the murder of another human being. A pro-life person cannot, by definition, do what Scott Roeder did, but an anti-abortion person can. I’ve said this for years, and believe it as strongly today as I ever have, if not more so.
Why does it matter? It matters because the mainstream media demonstrates its bias at exactly this point. Question, class: what term is used by the MSM for folks like me? If you listen, it’s clear and consistent: they call me, and people like me, “anti-abortion”—even though this is not the term that people in my camp choose for ourselves. Interestingly—and not surprisingly, given the MSM’s disregard for accuracy or fairness—the other side of the coin, which I’d call “pro-abortion”, is called “pro-choice” by the MSM. That is the term that the other side wishes to be known by. Reiterating, those on our side of the fence cannot be termed, in the MSM, by the term we choose, but the other side can. Hey, there’s fairness in media!
But the bigger point is this: in labeling me (incorrectly) “anti-abortion”, I am lumped in with murderers like Scott Roeder and the nutjobs who support, encourage, and vindicate them. And Scott Roeder is not on the team. And if justice prevails, he will, at the very least, spend the rest of this earthly life behind bars, after which he can explain to his Maker exactly what convoluted reasoning he employed to justify his heinous act.
Well, this isn’t Surprising…
November 28, 2009
Here’s an interesting article by a fellow Anthropogenic Global Warming skeptic (i.e., the idea that man’s activities are causing the earth to get warmer, a la Algore’s inane ramblings), detailing the information found out by a hacker who got “on the inside” of some privileged information:
Interesting read.
The Consequences of Darwinism
November 9, 2009
Here’s an article by an honest author who acknowledges that one of the (many) unpleasant legacies of the Darwinist lie is a moral nihilism that logically offers to impediment to evil, up to and including genocide:
Charles Darwin and the Children of Evolution
Ideas truly have consequences. I spoke yesterday on the response of the people of Jerusalem ( Nehemiah 8 ) to the Word of God proclaimed by Ezra. We live in a time when people, “having itching ears”, have turned away from truth and turned aside to fables, Darwinism among them. And when we do, we inevitably reap the consequences.
“No Kids”: The Ultimate in Self-Centered Culture
September 20, 2009
Have you heard of this one? A lady named Corinne Maier has written a book entitled No Kids: 40 Good Reasons Not to Have Children. Now, I stop short of saying that it’s demonstrably sinful for a couple to choose not to have kids, but I don’t stop very far short of it. There are Biblical and cultural reasons why I sincerely hope that this lady’s book is ignored to the degree it so richly deserves to be. But if you click on the link, you get, not only the chapter titles, but some of the actual chapters themselves.
What I want you to notice, though, is the underlying assumption: you exist only for the comfort, promotion, pampering, and coddling of yourself. It’s all about you–hang anybody else. I’m reminded, by contrast, with the words of H.I. McDonough (as played by Nicholas Cage) in the epic Raising Arizona. “We figured that every day we waited to bring a child into the world is a day he might regret having missed.”
Couldn’ta said it better myself…
This phrase comes from the 1978 "Jonestown massacre" in which most members of the Peoples Temple cult, blindly following their leader Jim Jones, committed suicide by drinking cyanide-laced Kool-Aid.
Osborne: A Contrarian's Guide to Knowing God
Schlossberg: Idols For Destruction
