<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Resolved: One of These Six People (Only) Will Be Our Next President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/</link>
	<description>refusing to drink the kool-aid for anyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-56991</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/13/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/#comment-56991</guid>
		<description>Well, I think that the best way to choose a candidate is a two-step process:

1. Identify all acceptable candidates, and 
2. Support the most electable one.  

Huck may not be all you&#039;d like him to be, but I&#039;d think he&#039;d be acceptable, particularly with some of his clarified positions, and a darn sight better than any Dem.  I consider him more electable than any conservative.  Ergo, he&#039;s the man.

Of course, for me, he&#039;s my first choice anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think that the best way to choose a candidate is a two-step process:</p>
<p>1. Identify all acceptable candidates, and<br />
2. Support the most electable one.  </p>
<p>Huck may not be all you&#8217;d like him to be, but I&#8217;d think he&#8217;d be acceptable, particularly with some of his clarified positions, and a darn sight better than any Dem.  I consider him more electable than any conservative.  Ergo, he&#8217;s the man.</p>
<p>Of course, for me, he&#8217;s my first choice anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-56989</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/13/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/#comment-56989</guid>
		<description>you have made your case for huckabee over and over, forgive me if im not won over by this &quot;no new taxes&quot; pledge... i was refering more to your general comment that one would be &quot;wasting his time&quot; by voting on conviction, even when your guy doesnt have a chance of winning...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have made your case for huckabee over and over, forgive me if im not won over by this &#8220;no new taxes&#8221; pledge&#8230; i was refering more to your general comment that one would be &#8220;wasting his time&#8221; by voting on conviction, even when your guy doesnt have a chance of winning&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-56948</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/13/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/#comment-56948</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I&#039;d encourage Ralph that voting is a privilege men have fought and died for.  Vote, even if you have to write in your own name.  Seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I&#8217;d encourage Ralph that voting is a privilege men have fought and died for.  Vote, even if you have to write in your own name.  Seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-56947</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/13/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/#comment-56947</guid>
		<description>Not all at once, but over the course of a few months, I think I&#039;ve tried to answer those questions.  There was a piece I posted on Huck&#039;s fiscal conservatism (Dick Morris); to that, I&#039;d add that he&#039;s taken a &quot;no new taxes&quot; pledge (which calms me down on that one, to me the biggest concern I had about him).  His immigration position is now strong enough that he&#039;s won the support of the leader of the Minutemen.  He&#039;s got the brains to bring somebody along with him to shore up his lack of foreign policy experience.  We don&#039;t even need to discuss his social conservatism, nor the fact that he&#039;ll appoint constructionists to the courts, which remains one of the top three issues (granted, most of the other Republicans would as well, including, if his word is worth anything, Rudy).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all at once, but over the course of a few months, I think I&#8217;ve tried to answer those questions.  There was a piece I posted on Huck&#8217;s fiscal conservatism (Dick Morris); to that, I&#8217;d add that he&#8217;s taken a &#8220;no new taxes&#8221; pledge (which calms me down on that one, to me the biggest concern I had about him).  His immigration position is now strong enough that he&#8217;s won the support of the leader of the Minutemen.  He&#8217;s got the brains to bring somebody along with him to shore up his lack of foreign policy experience.  We don&#8217;t even need to discuss his social conservatism, nor the fact that he&#8217;ll appoint constructionists to the courts, which remains one of the top three issues (granted, most of the other Republicans would as well, including, if his word is worth anything, Rudy).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/comment-page-1/#comment-56920</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 02:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2007/12/13/resolved-one-of-these-six-people-only-will-be-our-next-president/#comment-56920</guid>
		<description>ralph sounds like a good guy...i&#039;ll be waiting to hear your argument as to why i should vote for someone whom i dont believe should hold the position....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ralph sounds like a good guy&#8230;i&#8217;ll be waiting to hear your argument as to why i should vote for someone whom i dont believe should hold the position&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

