Rachel Carson and her Accomplices

This is exactly why we have to make sure, on issues like the environment, that we proceed with good science—and not with hysteria:

Hooray for DDT’s Life-Saving Comeback

Rachel Carson. They named a bridge after her in Pittsburgh, roughly the equivalent of naming one after Josef Mengele, it seems to me.

It’s great to see some of the environmental groups finally acknowledging that they were wrong. It’d be nicer if it brought back the tens of millions of children who have died needlessly, but better late than never, I suppose. I know I sound a little snarky on this one, but you know, it really, really ticks me off, and we’ve just got to do better than this. Much better. People suffer and die when we act on impulse. There’s a lot of blood on the hands of a lot of people here, not just some of the environmentalists; it was Richard Nixon’s EPA that bought into the hysteria generated by the ill-researched Silent Spring. Pathetic. Decisions made while in the grip of hysteria or hyper-emotionalism rarely produce good results.

From the article:

Junk-science debunker Steven Milloy, an adjunct scholar with the Competitive Enterprise Institute, wonders why the environmentalists took so long to change their minds.

“There are no new facts on DDT — all the relevant science about DDT safety has been available since the 1960s,” Milloy says.

Milloy adds: “It might be easy for some to dismiss the past 43 years of eco-hysteria over DDT with a simple ‘never mind,’ except for the blood of millions of people dripping from the hands of the WWF [World Wildlife Fund], Greenpeace, Rachel Carson, Environmental Defense Fund, and other junk science-fueled opponents of DDT.”

Milloy reminds us that the same people who spread DDT hysteria are now pushing the global-warming scare. “If they and others could be so wrong about DDT, why should we trust them now?”

When the stakes are this high—millions of lives—to do anything less than being certain is to invite chaos.

 


Post a Comment

  • No Kool Aid Zone?

    drink the Kool-Aid - to accept an argument or philosophy blindly.

    no kool aid zoneThis phrase comes from the 1978 "Jonestown massacre" in which most members of the Peoples Temple cult, blindly following their leader Jim Jones, committed suicide by drinking cyanide-laced Kool-Aid.

    Radically Tolerant - of all people, irrespective of race, faith, circumstance. As a person, you will be treated with the respect and dignity you deserve as an individual created in the image of God.

    Radically Intolerant - of slipshod reasoning, emotion without intellectual substance, bad ideas, lazy thinking, cowardly ad hominem attacks, the preposterous notion that 9/11 is some government conspiracy (proceed directly to the Loony Bin; do not pass "Go"; do not collect $200), the designated hitter, and the Dallas Cowboys.

  • Recent Comments

  • Top Commenters

  • 10 Best Books Recently Read

    A Peculiar People: The Church As Culture in a Post-Christian Society
    Clapp: A Peculiar People


    Osborne: A Contrarian's Guide to Knowing God


    Schlossberg: Idols For Destruction


    Unfinished Business:  Returning the Ministry to the People of GodOgden: Unfinished Business


    Reclaiming God\'s Original Intent for the ChurchMarshall: Reclaiming God's Original Intent for the Church


    Rumors of Another World: What on Earth Are We Missing?Yancey: Rumors of Another World


    Connecting Church, TheFrazee: The Connecting Church


    Total Truth: Liberating Christianity From It\'s Cultural CaptivityPearcey: Total Truth


    Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show BusinessPostman: Amusing Ourselves to Death


    Slouching Towards GomorrahBork: Slouching Towards Gomorrah


© 2012 - The No Kool Aid Zone | WordPress - Theme by XHTML Valid | Log in
Site managed and hosted by Oyler Photos and More