<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Challies on Discernment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/challies-on-discernment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/challies-on-discernment/</link>
	<description>refusing to drink the kool-aid for anyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/challies-on-discernment/comment-page-1/#comment-12057</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/12/challies-on-discernment/#comment-12057</guid>
		<description>Well, I mostly agree with you in this, Matt: they are in different categories.  I&#039;m more critical of Jabez than are you, though; I think that Wilkinson was extremely shoddy in his &quot;exposition&quot; of that obscure part of Scripture (in addition to the quasi-magical stuff).  I&#039;d not recommend his book to anybody, because I think he handles Scripture pretty poorly.  

That said, if someone told me he was bound and determined to read one of the two books, it&#039;d be no contest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I mostly agree with you in this, Matt: they are in different categories.  I&#8217;m more critical of Jabez than are you, though; I think that Wilkinson was extremely shoddy in his &#8220;exposition&#8221; of that obscure part of Scripture (in addition to the quasi-magical stuff).  I&#8217;d not recommend his book to anybody, because I think he handles Scripture pretty poorly.  </p>
<p>That said, if someone told me he was bound and determined to read one of the two books, it&#8217;d be no contest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/challies-on-discernment/comment-page-1/#comment-12054</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/10/12/challies-on-discernment/#comment-12054</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I agree with your point about our need for discernment!&lt;/b&gt;

However, I differ with you on your illustrations a bit.  Reading one and having read the other, I think that &quot;Your Best Life Now&quot; and &quot;The Prayer of Jabez&quot; are radically different books--not at all in the same category.

The problem with Osteen&#039;s book is its baptized worldliness.

The problem with Wilkinson&#039;s is not so much the content (it is basically an exposition of an obscure portion of scripture) as the quasi-magical way it has been applied by people who bought it off of the New York Times Bestseller list.  I can actually give it a qualified recommendation (while not thinking that it necessarily should be a best seller).

But again, the main point of your post is undeniable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I agree with your point about our need for discernment!</b></p>
<p>However, I differ with you on your illustrations a bit.  Reading one and having read the other, I think that &#8220;Your Best Life Now&#8221; and &#8220;The Prayer of Jabez&#8221; are radically different books&#8211;not at all in the same category.</p>
<p>The problem with Osteen&#8217;s book is its baptized worldliness.</p>
<p>The problem with Wilkinson&#8217;s is not so much the content (it is basically an exposition of an obscure portion of scripture) as the quasi-magical way it has been applied by people who bought it off of the New York Times Bestseller list.  I can actually give it a qualified recommendation (while not thinking that it necessarily should be a best seller).</p>
<p>But again, the main point of your post is undeniable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

