<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Design Used to &#8220;Prove&#8221; Darwinism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/</link>
	<description>refusing to drink the kool-aid for anyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/comment-page-1/#comment-3770</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/#comment-3770</guid>
		<description>Except that there is no single theory of Biblical Creationism, but rather an ongoing conversation that includes several different conclusions as to interpretation.  You&#039;re certainly right, Gil; Biblical Creationism does rely on the Bible as the inerrant Word, and I&#039;m sticking with that Bible, while being a bit unsure of certain specifics as to timing of creation, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that there is no single theory of Biblical Creationism, but rather an ongoing conversation that includes several different conclusions as to interpretation.  You&#8217;re certainly right, Gil; Biblical Creationism does rely on the Bible as the inerrant Word, and I&#8217;m sticking with that Bible, while being a bit unsure of certain specifics as to timing of creation, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gil Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/comment-page-1/#comment-3760</link>
		<dc:creator>Gil Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 04:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2006/02/02/intelligent-design-used-to-prove-darwinism/#comment-3760</guid>
		<description>Regardless of whether humanity truly evolved from blobs of jelly and monkeys, Creationists cannot prevail in the ongoing debate about our origins.  Their position is fatally flawed.  You see, the Creationist position fundamentally relies upon the premise that the Judeo-Christian Bible is the Word of God.  If itâ€™s not; if the Bible is just a book, then there is no Creationist position.  Recently, a lawyer embarked upon a mission to become the greatest Christian on the planet.  In his quest he made a profound discovery.  He discovered that the Bible is unequivocally not the Word of God.  His argument is compelling.  After reading his thesis, I am both shocked and embarrassed that I spent my whole life as a Christian and a Creationist.    And while his thesis does not invalidate the so-called theory of â€œIntelligent Design,â€ it absolutely dismantles the theory of Biblical Creationism.  You can read his Thesis at http://www.InDefenseOfGod.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether humanity truly evolved from blobs of jelly and monkeys, Creationists cannot prevail in the ongoing debate about our origins.  Their position is fatally flawed.  You see, the Creationist position fundamentally relies upon the premise that the Judeo-Christian Bible is the Word of God.  If itâ€™s not; if the Bible is just a book, then there is no Creationist position.  Recently, a lawyer embarked upon a mission to become the greatest Christian on the planet.  In his quest he made a profound discovery.  He discovered that the Bible is unequivocally not the Word of God.  His argument is compelling.  After reading his thesis, I am both shocked and embarrassed that I spent my whole life as a Christian and a Creationist.    And while his thesis does not invalidate the so-called theory of â€œIntelligent Design,â€ it absolutely dismantles the theory of Biblical Creationism.  You can read his Thesis at <a href="http://www.InDefenseOfGod.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.InDefenseOfGod.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

