<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Weird, Combo Response Post</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/a-weird-combo-response-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/a-weird-combo-response-post/</link>
	<description>refusing to drink the kool-aid for anyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/a-weird-combo-response-post/comment-page-1/#comment-2563</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/19/a-weird-combo-response-post/#comment-2563</guid>
		<description>It may be &quot;here to stay&quot;, but it&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;wrong&lt;/strong&gt;.  Nancy Pearcey&#039;s new book, &lt;strong&gt;Total Truth&lt;/strong&gt;, is a wonderful treatise, and it&#039;s last chapter talks about the application of a Christian worldview to all of life, including &lt;strong&gt;how&lt;/strong&gt; we go about doing things.  Aping the world&#039;s methodologies---particularly when it borders on lying---is beyond the pale.  

Look, I understand that conferences and the like need to get the word out; fair enough, and I get plenty of ads that most certainly do not cross the line.  But this one did, and many do, and I&#039;m going to keep &quot;thumbing my nose&quot;, because it&#039;s a problem.  And finally, I don&#039;t mean to disparage, necessarily, the organization, per se, but rather the organization&#039;s methodology in a given situation.  I don&#039;t think that PromiseKeepers is a bad outfit, even though their advertising lied to try to induce me to attend their Pastors&#039; Conference...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may be &#8220;here to stay&#8221;, but it&#8217;s <strong>wrong</strong>.  Nancy Pearcey&#8217;s new book, <strong>Total Truth</strong>, is a wonderful treatise, and it&#8217;s last chapter talks about the application of a Christian worldview to all of life, including <strong>how</strong> we go about doing things.  Aping the world&#8217;s methodologies&#8212;particularly when it borders on lying&#8212;is beyond the pale.  </p>
<p>Look, I understand that conferences and the like need to get the word out; fair enough, and I get plenty of ads that most certainly do not cross the line.  But this one did, and many do, and I&#8217;m going to keep &#8220;thumbing my nose&#8221;, because it&#8217;s a problem.  And finally, I don&#8217;t mean to disparage, necessarily, the organization, per se, but rather the organization&#8217;s methodology in a given situation.  I don&#8217;t think that PromiseKeepers is a bad outfit, even though their advertising lied to try to induce me to attend their Pastors&#8217; Conference&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/a-weird-combo-response-post/comment-page-1/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.byron-harvey.com/2005/08/19/a-weird-combo-response-post/#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>Great posts. Iâ€™m in total agreement with 2/3 of your responsesâ€¦including Jerry Falwell (SURPRISE!). And itâ€™s not that I disagree with you on the one response, as much as I am indifferent. I really donâ€™t have a position on so-called â€œChristian hype.â€ In fact, me thinks your hype on â€œhypeâ€ is over-hyped. Itâ€™s secular advertising, plain and simple. Itâ€™s the result of the modernization in the church. Itâ€™s what happens when the church becomes a product to be consumed. Itâ€™s hip. Itâ€™s trendy. It sells. Whatever draws a crowd, baby. Who cares if itâ€™s accurate? Thatâ€™s the society we live in. You donâ€™t have to like. But Iâ€™m not sure how productive it is to disparage any and all Christian organizations that use it. Thumb your nose at it all you like, but Iâ€™m afraid itâ€™s here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posts. Iâ€™m in total agreement with 2/3 of your responsesâ€¦including Jerry Falwell (SURPRISE!). And itâ€™s not that I disagree with you on the one response, as much as I am indifferent. I really donâ€™t have a position on so-called â€œChristian hype.â€ In fact, me thinks your hype on â€œhypeâ€ is over-hyped. Itâ€™s secular advertising, plain and simple. Itâ€™s the result of the modernization in the church. Itâ€™s what happens when the church becomes a product to be consumed. Itâ€™s hip. Itâ€™s trendy. It sells. Whatever draws a crowd, baby. Who cares if itâ€™s accurate? Thatâ€™s the society we live in. You donâ€™t have to like. But Iâ€™m not sure how productive it is to disparage any and all Christian organizations that use it. Thumb your nose at it all you like, but Iâ€™m afraid itâ€™s here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

