Loving Joel Osteen

I love Joel Osteen. I mean that with all sincerity. I am also involved in “outing” Joel Osteen. Can both of those things be true?

Of course they can…but in our syrupy, sentimental, sugary-sweet version of Christianity, we have so redefined “love” as to mean, effectively, its opposite at times.

I love Joel Osteen by

1. Praying for him. I have been convicted that I should pray for this man–and I have, and I do. I pray that he, having the platform that he does, will begin to use it to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ, instead of the self-help platitudes that only serve to apply Band-Aids to terminal problems (sin)–what a wonderful opportunity has been afforded him! I pray that a brother who “has his ear”, likely someone from a more Pentecostal branch of Christianity than I, will lovingly come alongside Joel and teach him the error of his ways, pointing him to the absolute necessity of preaching the whole gospel, not just a truncated version. I pray that through some venue, he will receive sound theological training, something which he clearly lacks, not that seminary alone prepares a man to minister God’s truth (it certainly does not), but it is reckless for a man to wield the position and power that he does and be unable to articulate fundamental truth. I honestly assume, giving him the benefit of the doubt, that he is unable, for that is a benign reading; if he is able, but unwilling, then this reveals him as a more sinister character.

2. Refusing to judge his heart. As I have made clear in my posts–and as I’d challenge all “Osteen-outers” to do in theirs–I do not in any way presume to know his heart–one way or the other. He may very, very well be a born-again, blood-bought brother in Jesus Christ; in fact, I will operate under that assumption. With all my heart, I hope this to be the case. At any rate, I am totally unqualified to judge his relationship with God or lack thereof–totally.

3. Judging his message, not his motives. Again, I don’t presume to know what makes him “tick”. What I can do–and what, in the name of discernment, I must do–is to judge the message that he is delivering. He has written Your Best Life Now, a book which, as its title suggests, purports to help individuals live life to the fullest. The writing of a book by this title is a noble pursuit! The question is, does this book give people the tools to actually do what it purports to do? The Christian answer to this question is wrapped up in the gospel of Jesus Christ, its acceptance and its outworking in the life of the believer. Any “answer” put forward by a Christian which does not put the saving gospel of Jesus front and center is a sub-Christian “answer”. Unfortunately, this is the case with this book. It is not unloving to say that. What would be “unloving” would be to say nothing, to allow false teaching about these core issues to go unchallenged, to consign the readers of this book, and the listeners to Mr. Osteen’s messages, to persist in the belief that what they were receiving was the gospel of Christ, when in fact it is not. That would be a supremely unloving act, toward both the listeners/readers, and toward Mr. Osteen himself.

Some have asked, “why are you so concerned with what this man preaches? Why does it matter to you?” To this, there is a simple answer: God’s glory matters. Eternity matters. People matter. We “out” Joel Osteen–in fact, it is his false message that we “out” more than him–for the same reason that the firemen rushed into the Twin Towers on 9/11: there is imminent danger, in this case, to the eternal souls of men and women who might believe Osteen’s message and think that they have come to Christ, when in fact they have not. It would have been unloving for the NYFD and NYPD to sit in a pub around the corner and watch the events unfold on TV as they nursed a beer, they who understood the problem, were equipped, and had the ability to do something about it. Similarly, it would be unloving of us to stand idly by while people are led astray.

 


  1. 9 Responses to “Loving Joel Osteen”

  2. Byron – the tiny URL is broken and leads back to the front page. I am interested in what you mean by “outing him.”

    I can tell you that his hair products budget is more than the GNP of Botswana. And he almost has a mullet. I saw him on TV sunday and when I stand to look, I am pretty sure that the length of his hair in the back reached the technical definition of a mullet. He was preaching on guardian angels but I am pretty sure his angels are not doing much to protect him from being in the mullet zone.

    Scary.

    Warren Throckmorton ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 11:21 am


  3. Warren,

    You win the week’s award for “finding an ancient post and commenting on it”. I recognize that the term “outing” has a certain connotation, but I think I was using a term that someone else involved in the effort to expose Osteen as a non-evangelical, non-gospel-preacher had already used. And tinyURLs typically staledate after awhile. I don’t generally count on folks going back and reading ancient posts, but hey, it happens! If my “just read by other visitors” item posted recently on the sidebar by WebbieDude Paul is any indication, people do it all the time. Go figure…

    Byron ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 11:36 am


  4. Oh that kind of outing…

    Hey, I like awards. What do I get? (lobbing the softball up to the plate for Byron to whiff at).

    Warren Throckmorton ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 11:48 am


  5. You get the “Lame Guy who finds ancient posts to increase his own count” award. welcome to the club.

    Hefe ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 12:38 pm


  6. BTW, there is shipping charge for the award, Payable to “The No Koolaid Zone”, of $12.95. The award, coincidentally, is shaped like a mullet. But it is not actual size, so you can’t wear it.

    Hefe ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 12:40 pm


  7. Hefe – Are you the president or president-elect of the “Find Ancient Posts to Increase His Own Count Club” (FAPIHOC)? I forget.

    Warren Throckmorton ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 1:08 pm


  8. No, it’s not the FAPIHOC, but rather the LWL Club…Losers without Lives…

    Byron ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 3:22 pm


  9. Hmmm, let’s see, people who read Byron’s blog are LWLs. Well, now that’s a catchy marketing strategy.

    Warren Throckmorton ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 3:43 pm


  10. Let’s not jump the gun. I am only forming an exploratory committee to investigate the possibility of running for president of the FAPIHOC.

    I categorically deny any association whatsoever with the LWL organization, unless it means we get to make more fun of Byron.

    Hefe ~ Nov 27, 2006 at 3:50 pm


Post a Comment

© 2010 - The No Kool Aid Zone | WordPress - Theme by XHTML Valid | Log in
Site managed and hosted by Justified By Grace Web Services